EveryCircuit
Contact
Reviews
Home
eekee
modified 2 years ago

Fast Clocks

4
5
363
05:09:44
Just my personal reference page. These fast clocks fall into 3 groups: * combined pulse sources, which offer precision but tend to be fiddly to set up. 5 sources is probably the least fiddly. * EC-specific, which may produce the fastest possible clock for any given simulation speed: 555; Counter-CMOS * Semi-realistic; a very compact one is included here: L-C-NOT @@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ combined pulse sources 5 stacked pulse sources: * 5.25 x 4x4 component size (inc. ground) * 5x max freq * round number adjustments * output as crisp as you'd like 4 'trains' + XOR: * 4.5 x 4x4 component size [+ ground] * 4x max freq * output not so crisp. conflict between gate delay option and simulation speed. 'trains' + resistors: * quick setup, just set delay * logic levels weak, but edges crisp if not driving a funny load. it's good enough for counter with 3 sources, but with 4 sources it may require some thought. @@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ EC-specific counter-cmos: -- credit: @nikisali * fastest any sim speed can deal with, perhaps limited by the fets. * for a speed limit, add a resistor between A and the FET gates. it works with the gate capacitance. 555-based: -- credit: @hurz * only 2 components! * seems to be fastest any sim speed can deal with * slows the simulation down -- hence the switch @@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ semi-realistic l-c-invert: * the smallest, 3.25 component size * evidently not too limited by gate delay * to start and run as a fastclock (faster than the simulator comfortably supports), it requires large inductor. replacing the ground with a logic source may allow manual start while keeping it very small All these together slow down the simulator noticeably on my tablet, although I don't recall any one of them doing so alone, except the 555.
published 7 years ago
jason9
7 years ago
On my tablet all of them together (except the 555 of course) slows the simulation down to about one third or so max speed.
eekee
7 years ago
I'm actually not getting more than 2/3 speed on my Core I5. Maybe Chrome's NaCl is less efficient than Android somehow.
jason9
7 years ago
I’m using iPad Air V1 (look up: A1474).
eekee
7 years ago
My tablet is Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 (3rd generation). I don't know much about recent CPU performance, maybe I ought to start looking these things up, but it's not that important to me. I'm thinking maybe Chrome apps only get to use 1 core when the mobile apps can use all 4. That would about account for the difference.
eekee
5 years ago
(The counter one was a problem in 1.20, but it's fixed now. Thanks, devs!)

EveryCircuit is an easy to use, highly interactive circuit simulator and schematic capture tool. Real-time circuit simulation, interactivity, and dynamic visualization make it a must have application for professionals and academia. EveryCircuit user community has collaboratively created the largest searchable library of circuit designs. EveryCircuit app runs online in popular browsers and on mobile phones and tablets, enabling you to capture design ideas and learn electronics on the go.

Copyright © 2026 by MuseMaze, Inc.     Terms of use     Privacy policy