⭐️D-flip flop toggle switch⭐️

💋beautiful

Unnecessarily overcomplicated and again using the npn's incorrectly. If you want to show off with obfuscated circuits and use big words to make yourself look smart, then atleast make sure they are easily understood. Rob had only just demonstrated this more elegantly without resorting the complications you throw in! There's a reason why npn are used for low side switching and pnp for high side, if you can't understand why then yereon you shouldn't be boldly pushing your confusing circuits onto others. The way used the transistors here work okay in the sim because everything is perfect, but this would not be the case in the real world

Almost forgot.... http://everycircuit.com/circuit/5825990945931264

Noobs, like Lenny, do love this way of driving LEDs, check this http://everycircuit.com/circuit/5785209963020288

Great demo hurz. That's the point, common emitters supplies constant current (aslong as there's sufficient source) even when leds drift due to positive temperature coefficient or differ in voltage thresholds. Nice examples of the voltage drops too! Lenny ain't a noob, 5 years plus but he still don't understand (or attempt to understand) the basics but charades like an authority in electronics!?! For your benefit lenny, pull up for pnp (source current) and pull down for npn (drain current)

Okay, you’ve made a few valid points however this configuration does work and given the fact that it may be possible to remove the base resistor and just have the one resistor in the circuit to limit both the base current and the LED's current, it can save on parts, and if you have a lot of these circuits in you design that reduction in parts can soon add up.

Noobs do love this configuration, IDK why

It is all wrong yereon. You drive the leds inefficiently with your common collector setup, then why bother using the transistors at all unless convolution is your aim. Drive the leds directly off the latch is better than your configuration here, which makes your point about reducing component count by a resistor on your circuit ridiculous and moot

Two points worth mentioning: Firstly, I'm not @yereon, I don't need to masquerade as other users nor do I need cheerleaders to bolster my arguments. Secondly, this circuit works in it's current configuration and whilst there are avenues for further improvement, driving LED's from a transistor is a practical solution.

The practical Avenue of bistable can sufficiently supply the led s directly,,,,, hope yhis helps @ yeronzulz.

Lenzrulz you are yereon that is a fact! Yes you have masqueraded as yereon to bolster your own argument, it is all black&white evident in your posts and your personality and your faith! You will do absolutely anything to win your argument 'including twisting and lying' no matter how wrong you are, it's a trait of being a creationist and something screwy in your head. This argument about the wrong use of transistors is a prime example... I tell you you've got your transistors wrongly wired, you say it works, we show you why it's inneffecient and it should be common emitter, you insist you can save on parts using it as common collector (??), I say your better off not using the transistors at all 'in this manner' that will save you whole lotta parts, now like a dog chasing its own tale you twist it as 'using transistors to drive leds is a practical solution' as a way of throwing it back in my face!?! WTF lenny have we been trying to tell you, its used in common emitter mode for it to be a practical solution, and it is such an easy ammendment to your circuit!! But NO, rather than fixing it and hurt your pride you will stubbornly argue how right you are. And you will stoop so low to use false accounts to 'cheerlead' yourself on to retain your ego like you have in the past. Pathetic doesn't even begin to sum you up, go back under the rock you been living in with all your other creationists clan

Okay, so the problem (as I see it) are your false narratives concerning a number of issues including religiosity and my alleged fake persona. I’ll gladly discuss any contentious topic with you via email but not here - not on this app. Moving along, my circuit works in it’s current (transistor) configuration (anyone can google this info) and I’ve alluded to the fact that there are several avenues worth exploring but this doesn’t negate the practical functionality of my circuit. Throwing your toys out of your cot in a temper tantrum because I won’t alter my circuit is your choice but my advice to you is to stop posting nonsensical comments and focus on what you do best - publishing amazing LED circuits.

BTW, my original circuit never had any transistors but your mentor went off on a wild tangent arguing the fact that logic gates cannot power up LED’s on their own. He fell silent once I added the transistors in their current configuration and never followed the argument you’re propagating. Then he has a “light bulb” moment after reading your comments and echoes your sentiments.

Whatever you say, it is all bullshit. Post a link to a site showing you are correct using this method, go on redeem yourself....

Google produced this result in under 3s: https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/151326/bjt-driving-an-led-above-or-below

Yeronzul bistable is not a logic GATE. check data sheets, or get your double zulyeron do it..

Well congrats lenz you've hit on a discussion forum again! This does not prove anything either way, they're opinions of pros and cons of using common collector in specific circumstances (that doesn't cover your scenario), OPINIONS! Now howabout a reputable link, something like this... https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/transistors/all

Lenny you are a joke, isn't that the same idiotic strategy you referenced yaahoo for common sense. LOL

Yep lenz picks up on discussion forums as official source, that is a joke

Listen lenny let's not lose focus of why we are discussing (arguing) this, it's because the manner in which you publish your circuits making them look like official source of technical info, VERY misleading to newcomers!! You can do whatever the hell you want, use common collector in the wrong manner we don't care. Just don't make yourself look like the electronics authority around here, I don't care if you interprate that as a mandate... what you are doing is wrong!!!

It is lemmmyd religion yo mislead,, hoping eventually making us believe earth is flat and 6 days old,,,, it seems to be a champagne., these wierd cults are at it everyehere i,, specially in states,, on utube,, how much monry the sickos soend to pit stupidity on video on utube.!? Btw. Current flies in the direction of arrow ➡ , PNP and NPN, have been purposely made for different usage,,, there are several reasons behind what @Roops recommended,, down to atomic level of the semiconductor.

Btw the forum info you supplid moosio. Lemmmmy. Is crap,,,, and you must know it,, otherwise WHY an oxford english vocab guy, choose forum ss referance,,,, Basically,, hypocracy,,, and charlatanism. Written all-over,,,,,, i wonder if lemmmy bleeches his face to look holey,,.. Lol......

Opinions, keep that in mind the next time you post your comments...😎

lenz that comment aimed at me? I won't interfere with your opinions on electronics layout aslong as you're not masquerading your work as a tutorial, I will leave you in peace

Masquerading my work as a tutorial? I’ll leave you with your opinions, have a great day.

Earth is flat and 6 days old. Is that an opinion too! F

Lemmmy left as an idiot, come back as a moron.

This is helpful: http://everycircuit.com/circuit/6448172919160832

Oh jeez do I have to point out the bloody obvious above you... "D-type flip-flops are used in prescalar/divider circuits and frequency phase detectors. This circuit shows how a D-flip-flop can be made to change state and switch two coloured LED's".... sure sounds like a tutorial to me, but hey that's my opinion right? Again this wouldn't be problem if your circuit was fit to serve as tutorial material!

Everyone reads and understands data differently, the fact that you interpret this data as being tutorial proves my point. You're better than this, don't drag your good reputation through ambiguous mud.

"this circuit shows..." is a tutorial., its not opinion,, it is a tutorial..

Hey lenny, why not just add these two phrases at the beginning of descriptions to all your circuits to avoid misunderstandings. #1- "In my opinion this circuit does the following..." #2- "Any non-standard or abnormal components or configurations can purchased through "lenzcomputers@aol.com" or possibly lenzcomponents@bluelight.com". Then nobody would question your postings as they have been called CRAP

Intellectuals don't question my circuits but you are welcome to follow your own advice, have a nice day...👍🏻

"This circuit shows how a D-flip-flop can be made to change state..." Charlatans do use such phrases, cuz they have no idea what a D FF can do for them. "...be made to change state..." lol

lol, charlatan 🤧

CharLoLratan..lol

Lol...😂

Lenz why is it I have to re-explain myself to you time after time after time? I find it condescending you saying that you're disappointed in me and I'm better than this, WTF you think I'm some naive child? That and trying your best to butter me up in a vain attempt to make me reconsider my 'in your words' alliance I have with hurz and kiani... I ain't doing this to please them, I'm doing this cos I detest what you are. I had let it slide many a times in the past your disregard for good practices in electronics, you're a law unto yourself and dismiss everybody else who tells you otherwise about how to design electronics (there is a distinct wrong and right in electronics it is a solid science and not an art where we all have opinions). All that can be ignored if you want to live in your own fantasy world that's fine, but don't go imposing your bad practices unto others! What really took the biscuit is when you finally let slip your true colours and arrogance, you really do see us all below you don't you! Your words 'fanatical atheists and evolutionists need to be put into place and it's best we all march to the same step' , this lenz was my WTF moment and realised who I was dealing with and my turning point! That and your blatant use of a false account to bolster your own argument really ticked me off!! BTW there is no such thing as fanatical atheists, it's a hypocritical derogatory term coined by yourselves, the true fanatics! I wish I can make this more public for all to see what you really are

I have nothing against religions be they Christians Muslims Hindus Jews Sikhs or whatever. Its the fanatics I hate, they will twist and lie all facts to justify themselves and dangerous beliefs, its a trait of being a fanatic and this is very evident in you lenz

You're welcome to hang on to your false narrative because that's your prerogative. Your comments about science being solid is fine but what you have to realise is that even scientists can't agree on the same hypothesis. So what would you call that, a solid science fact or opinion? And then it was your rant about my alleged discussion about fanatical atheists and evolutionists. If you go around labelling every belief system you don't agree with as being fanatical then you should accept the same criticism about whatever you hold to be true. But we can discuss it another time if you like. Your bone of contention isn't with me, obviously your bone of contention is historically based, probably dealing with other individuals who ruffled your feathers. Whatever your problem is it's not me. And giving your comments regarding solid science, as you know science is evidence based and I'd love to see any evidence you can bring to the party which substantiates your false allegations and narratives. As I said before you better than this, do what you do best, publish circuits and stop posting silly unsubstantiated narratives.

Wow you truly are delusional! What you just said about hard proven science sums up a lot about you, what you're using holding in your hand right now to relay your hypocritical messages is only possible because of sciences not religion, the same sciences you're questioning by your stupid excuses! Silly unsubstantiated narratives... REALY? And you have the audacity to TELL me what I'm thinking, I don't have the ability to know my own thoughts? your arrogance is beyond comprehension. Keep it up lenny you are really showing your true colours here for all to see

Talking about your argument scientists not agreeing and calling it opinions. How many sects of Christianity is there, how many interpretations of the BIBLE that you guys can't agree on, how many Bibles?? Pot calling the kettle black... AGAIN! But cannot compare science with religion, science is the discovery of the true nature of the universe, religion is man made beliefs written in books thousands of years old (books that had been re/mis-interpreted many times on the way to suit the self-interested religious powers)... so where are the facts in these books!

wyoelk has the best suggestion upstairs. Why not call a truce and just do what he suggested in #1, but if you can also supply these components then yeah stick in point #2 ;)

Disagreements among scientists isn’t “delusional”. For example, it’s entirely possible that one or more scientists may be making an inaccurate claim owing to incompetence or they may be intentionally or unintentionally biasing claims owing to idiosyncratic attitudes, beliefs, or personal interests. Furthermore, religion and science don’t clash. While science is a wonderful tool for understanding the physical universe, religious beliefs answers philosophical questions like how mere humans can be significant at all in the context of the universe. I would encourage you to quit posting your false narratives and focus on what you do best, publishing awesome circuits.

Do you bother reading what I write? That's what I said religion and science shouldn't be compared! Why are you even bringing up some argument about maybe one scientist maybe making false claims, this is not science, this sort of research never makes it off the starting line cos it is lacking empirical data that the rest of the scientific community can verify, and it has absolutely nothing to do with everyday science that affects our daily lives like electronics! Why don't you just stop convoluting and mixing up everything in a weak attempt to justify your religion as more factual by having a knock at the foundation of science. It is religion that is TOTALLY made up of unfounded claims by exactly what you explained "inaccurate claim owing to incompetence or they may be intentionally or unintentionally biasing claims owing to idiosyncratic attitudes, beliefs, or personal interests"!!! Again you show you're getting your arse mixed up from your brains. So why don't YOU stop these false narratives, I don't know why we are even arguing these facts! It is you who is pushing the button and perpetuating these arguments in attempt to get your last flawed word in!! It is obvious with your belief system you don't belong here because you are solely here to antogonise everyone with your arrogant behaviour. So stop this argument now!

Typical straw man argument, you really need to wrap your head around theological issues such as hermeneutics and exegesis before posting embarrassing religious statements. Speaking of empirical evidence, I assume you know the difference between hypothesis and empirical evidence? How about the science method? Data can be presented and interpreted differently, there isn't always an overwhelming consensus within the scientific community. Moving along, quit these fanciful narratives and publish something awesome.

Lenzrulz you really are toxic! Laughably you are constantly referring to yourself with silly statements of 'straw man argument' and 'embarrassing religious statements' and this all you have been doing. You will resort to any twisted bull crap to prove your delusional views in your feeble mind. Why are you even persuing this line of questioning, it is incoherent drivel makes no sense at all, you are suffering from verbal diarrhea. It is obvious you are trying to throw the attention off from the questions I put to you about your own Bibles, answer those questions or shut-up and end this. You have proven you just want to perpetuate these arguments thinking you can make me give up and you can claim yourself victorious over proving absolutely nothing!

Look what Lenny spend for an effort, and he will do that again and again. When does he spend a similar effort in talking about a circuit? NEVER hes not here for electronics he is here with bad intentions. Electronics he give a shit! He loves it to be toxic thats his motivation to be on everycircuit.

I’ve asked you to provide evidence to back up your outlandish narratives and to date, you’ve provided none. Then you went on a religious rant trying to draw me into a futile debate while trying to dodge my evidential requests. When none of the above dodges worked, you threw in few science verses religion quirks. Okay so you can’t provide any evidence but to repeatedly ignore my request not to discuss religion on this platform reeks of inconsideration for the EC community my friend. Quit the non-evidential narratives and silly behaviour and get on with publishing awesome circuits.

Werner, this ends when you stop posting your comments on my circuits...😡

I've more than answered your silly questions many times over but really don't owe you any explanations at all, I've given you more respect than you deserve. I'm sick of you constantly twisting the truth and my answers. You instigated this whole religious baloney with your 'fanatical atheists evolutionists...' quote. I have dodged nothing, it is you who has dodged my questions with a ironic excuse it shouldn't be discussed here because it is religious, the truth is you are afraid your answers will be ripped to shreds cos your foundation is weak. So if it's your own shallow victory you want claim for your beliefs, go ahead and claim it. It still doesn't change the truth! Now shut up, I've wasted too much time thanks to you

@roops1967. I'll risk another typical ' post and dash' accusation, but debating whackadoodles is like herding cats, particularly with the master of the non sequitur. It's not worth it.

Lenny show us one thread half this length, just half but about any technical aspects! No? Nothing!? Have you ever talked about electronics, no? Never ever. So what are you doing here on everycircuit? Go troll yourself somewhere else and leave this community behind you, do all a favour and deinstall everycircuit. Ciao Lenny

When all else fails...some things never change huh Max?

Good idea roops, I’ve been encouraging you to quit posting your non-evidential narratives because such behaviour is unbecoming of your character but I willing to discuss my “weak foundation” via email plus I’ll show you how you began your creationist red herring temper tantrum and my subsequent response which really upset you. Meanwhile have a nice day...😎

Amen to that lenz... 😎 Now if you will just take on our little teeny weeny request that you change the wording in your future circuit descriptions ever so slightly to add the following "In my opinion this circuit does the following..." is not asking too much to keep the peace is it

No thank you but I'm confident that if we respect each other, the entire EC community will benefit.

max I shoulda heeded your warning awhile back, never gonna get the many wasted hours of my life back, yeah hurz I heard you too warning me of the same. I like that word 'sequitur' I had to look it up, you used it in the best context above ;)

Yes lenz I welcome you telling me that my own perception of events are all wrong and you will be dictating my thoughts and decisions for me

Wrong narrative my friend, all I want is for all of us to coexist peacefully, so let's leave this nonsense behind us and move forward.

You call him narrative and then you want peace and move forward. Lenny you are a comedian 24/7 from your basement room 🤧💨

I never called him a narrative you funny retired obnoxiously condescending person...😂

lenz you might aswell as called me 'narrative', it seems to be your favourite word along with 'false'. Anything factual presented to you is 'false narrative' cos it contradicts you or your belief system. And now you will be replying to this with 'I would love to see evidence to your false narrative' or how I've avoided answering your convoluted questions for which I don't owe you any explanation for... or shit like that. There no point in showing you any evidence when you want evidence to back up that evidence and so on, and substantiated evidence is from accredited sites you will call it opinions when you yourself present gossip and opinions that fits your 'narrative' as official evidence. By the way I haven't forgotten the dirty tricks you play 'yereon', there's no limit to how low you will stoop just to claim victory in your feeble mind. You say you're keeping in EC T&C when infact you are running circles around it as a guise to constantly spam this forum with misleading circuits just to gain likes and popularity to feed your selfish ego. Just because you paid the entry fee does not give you the right to shit all over the playground. Five years plus and still your convoluted spamming circuits disguised as 'informative tutorials' are flawed by beginner mistakes which you refuse to amend so not to bruise that selfish ego of yours. Quite simply you do not belong here!

All further correspondences from you will be ignored

Cool, now let's move forward and dispense with nonsensical rhetoric. BTW, I'm looking forward to the publication of an awesome circuit, have a nice day...😎

The microphone drop attempt by lemmmy..

More idiocy...😡

@Bushmills, any atmospheric toxicity comes from your keyboard as evidenced by your REPOSTED LYING NARRATIVES posted BELOW this comment! *BELOW* - Preposition Beneath, under, lower than, less than, inferior to, subordinate to, subject to, controlled by, under the heel of. That’s right, your lying narratives BELOW - never preceding my comments! Unfortunately, not even your cowardly script usage can help you!