migs

modified 8 years ago

Free energy

395

08:53:01

Thanks to this someone i made this kind of circuit. If you saw this just comment so i can thank you. This circuit is untested but try to figure out if this really work. This kind of weird but worth to try

published 8 years ago

Poptart133g

8 years ago

The simulation isn't perfect, so that's probably a bug in the program. If you inject noise into the circuit you'll see that the simulation realizes something is wrong, and crashes. If you didn't know, you can shake your phone to inject noise to act as short voltage spikes to test how circuits react.

nikisalli

8 years ago

You used a 200% efficient transformer that can't exist in real life. bullshit

selman

8 years ago

Coupling coefficient > 1 means secondary coil is getting more MMF than the primary coil is sending ie more magnetic flux at the secondary than that is actually sent, which means that the transformer is acting as a current amplifier (since current is directly proportional to magnetic flux), breaking the rule Power in = Power out, instead power out > power in (which is not possible). Increase the secondary winding to decrease the turns ratio and your free energy will demand payment.

Forcer

8 years ago

@nikisalli that is not right actually. this kind of transformator will transform you Voltage up. and the current will go down so you have the same amount of energy. the only think that will happen is that your transformator will explode

hurz

8 years ago

@Forcer, measure power in and out and come back to niki.

selman

8 years ago

Do coupling coefficient essentially mean efficiency ???

hurz

8 years ago

200% efficency, 1mW power in, 2mW power out. Even 100% is unrealistic. Very big/hugh transformer can reach 99%. Small onces for home use reach 85%

selman

8 years ago

So, is my comment wrong?... be honest. 😁

hurz

8 years ago

I think its not wrong, but its nasty to demonstrate with EC transformer they seems to have many hidden feature and probably doubel as much bugs.

hurz

8 years ago

Check this for the 100% case http://everycircuit.com/circuit/5051242631135232 but it gets really ugly if coupling coefficient is higher then 1 e.g. already at 1.01!

Forcer

8 years ago

@hurz the ratio of secondary and primary has nothing to do with efficiency. of cause 200% is not possible. But if your primary coil is 1 and your secondary coil is 2 you transform your voltage up and your current down your power is the same it is common that you use transformators in both ways to transform your voltage up and down. I don't know what the programme is doing but in real life you can do it in both ways. maybe in the programme the ratio of the coils is the same as the efficiency idk but that's not the case with real life transformators

Forcer

8 years ago

take the Tesla coil as example you have 20V and you transform it up to 100kV that doesn't mean that your efficiency is 200% or higher because your current drops so low that P=U *I is the same

hurz

8 years ago

@Forcer, this is exactly what I tried to proof/demonstrate, that the efficency is independend of the ratio. Have you followed my calculation and saw how independed it is at least below 100% efficency? Wasn't that clear?

FernandoCPF

8 years ago

Pobre relay...

hurz

8 years ago

In older cars there are so called "indicator relay" to switch the left or right yellow light. Its working fine over decades for cars. Why you guys dont trust relais?

migs

7 years ago

i think you miss something on my circuit. thus even me i think this part of the circuit is something that cant be made not until in near future.

add comment in editor